CMC – Gay rights activist, Maurice Tomlinson Friday suffered a set back in his challenge of the buggery laws in Jamaica after a three-member panel of judges unanimously dismissed his matter.
The judges of the island’s Constitutional Court ruled that the Savings Law Clause of the Constitution prevents it from enquiring into the section of the Offences Against the Person Act which prohibits buggery.
Tomlinson had asked the Court to determine whether it had the jurisdiction to enquire into the constitutionality of Sections 76, 77 and 79 of the Offences Against the Person Act (OAPA), in light of the Savings Law Clause in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment) Act.
Sections 13(12) and 18 of the charter Jamaican Charter of Rights and Freedoms, immunise from constitutional challenge existing laws that criminalise sexual relations between men and preclude legal recognition of homosexual unions, respectively.
They are referred to in the Commonwealth Caribbean as ‘Savings Law’ clauses.
In Jamaica’s case, existing laws are laws which were in existence before the charter came into force. The OAPA was brought into force in 1864.
The unanimous ruling was delivered by Justice David Batts, on behalf of a three-member panel of judges. He said constitutional amendments in 2011 “are clear” that “Parliament intended to protect laws related to sexual offences from review for unconstitutionality.”
“The claim in consequence stands dismissed,” the Judge said, adding that costs have been reserved for further submission.
But the attorney said that they would not be pursuing costs given the nature of the matter and the public interest.
“So the order will be that there will be no order as to costs,” the Court ruled.
About The Author
More Stories
Man dies following stabbing incident
Cancer research, charities to benefit from event
Player of the Week – Prime Minister’s Cup